In a rapidly changing world full of strange new assemblages of species, the goal posts for conservation aren’t as clear as they once were. What is it we’re trying to conserve, and against what threat? And where do we look for guidance on how to do it when the rules appear to be changing faster than ever? Dealing with novel ecosystems in a time of accelerating change is an enormous challenge. However, two recent collaborations I’ve been involved in have come up with some helpful guidelines on how to proceed. One examines how to predict characteristics of novel ecosystems (Catford et al. 2013, discussed in this story). The other focusses on measuring levels of biological invasion as one way of gauging the extent of…
It may come as a shock to some people, but I am delighted to say that Canberra is now my home.
For those who aren’t so familiar with Australian snobbery, Canberra (along with our South Australian sister, (R)Adelaide) tends to get a pretty bad rap. Boring; nothing to do; weird; where are the milk bars?!
While I nod my head appreciably at the last comment (and, dare I say, groovy wine bars?!), the first few seem to come from people who a) have never been to Canberra, b) came once during primary school to visit Parliament House or c) have very poor taste.
My response to this:
fast, flowing mountain bike trails winding through beautiful grassy woodland all of ten minutes from Canberra’s CBD;
Two hours to the coast, two hours to the mountains;
And then there are the after work strolls with kangaroos, kookaburras, cockatoos, wallabies, rosellas…
Clearly, I am a “nature lover” (surprising, I know) and Canberra offers “nature” in droves. As well as being great for one’s physical and mental wellbeing, this also presents some great work opportunities as the field really isn’t that far away. To illustrate, I’ll briefly introduce a couple of the field sites where some of my colleagues in the Fenner School of Environment and Society work.
Mulligans Flat–Goorooyarroo Woodland Experiment
Located in a couple of nature reserves 15 km north of central Canberra, the Mulligans Flat–Goorooyarroo Woodland Experiment is a partnership between the Australian National University, the ACT Government and CSIRO. The aim of the project is to find ways of improving box-gum grassy woodland for biodiversity and the experiment manipulates and monitors a whole raft of factors (see figure above).
One of the many exciting aspects of this experiment is the reintroduction of the Tasmanian Bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) – it has been extinct from the mainland of Australia for 80 years. Regarded as an ecosystem engineer, it will be interesting to learn what effects the Bettong has on the ecosystem.
Tumut Fragmentation Study
Based in the Buccleuch State Forest 100 km west of Canberra, the idea for the Tumut Fragmentation Experiment was sparked when David Lindenmayer was flying from Canberra to Melbourne. Peering out of the plane window, David saw an area of native forest that had been cleared for a radiata pine (Pinus radiata) plantation. Rather than just bulldozing the whole lot of it though, patches of native forest had been left. Representative of the original forest, these patches varied in size from half a hectare to 200 hectares thus providing a great way to study effects of forest fragmentation on biodiversity.
In all, the Conservation and Landscape Ecology group at Fenner run seven large-scale longitudinal field studies, all located in south eastern Australia. Long-term, large-scale ecological studies are pretty rare in Australia, yet provide incredibly valuable insights because many ecological processes occur at the landscape-scale, it can take a long time for ecosystems to respond to certain actions and it can also be very hard to detect ecological responses when background levels of variability are so high (just think of weather patterns versus climate change). A major impediment to establishing long-term studies is the fact that most grants last for only a few years. While there is increasing support and appreciation of long-term studies (the merits of which are nicely illustrated by the Long Term Ecological Research Network in the US), many researchers rely on passion, strong working relationships and cheap labour (i.e. their own) to maintain such research.
I have been in the Fenner School at the Australian National University for a few months now and I am just loving it. Although I am still employed by the University of Melbourne and retain strong links with the Quantitative and Applied Ecology research group, I will be based here for the duration of my grant and hopefully, fingers crossed, beyond that.
If you are ever in town, or are keen to visit, please drop me a line. We could even go to Parliament House.
About this time last year, I wrote an article for H2O Thinking, a water management magazine published by eWater (until recently the eWater CRC). While the turnaround time is nothing to envy, the piece found its place on the web earlier this week.
In the article, I focus on two questions that anyone* who has spent any time along a river will surely have asked:
Why are river banks, floodplains and floodplain wetlands so susceptible to alien species invasion?
And what can we do about it?
Well, I’m not going to give the game away, but lets just say that the words “flow” and “regulation” do make an appearance. Click here for more scintillating reading (?!).
Located on the Canadian border, smack bang in the middle of the US, Minnesota is indeed a land of many lakes. While this postcard does sell them a bit short (there are in fact about 15,000 lakes and that doesn’t include those with more pond-like dimensions), it communicates the basic facts: there are a LOT of water bodies in this part of the world. And for someone who is partial to water, that is a pretty cool thing.
To illustrate: within 10 days of arriving, I have had dinner at Dave’s house with his lab group and Simon Levin (another super high-echelon ecologist visiting from Princeton), gone to an EEB summer barbeque, spent a day out at Cedar Creek and to top it off, I’ve just returned from a “lab get-away” at the Tilman family cabin that is situated on a lake (of course!) ~3 hours north of Minneapolis. A pretty good start, I would say.
2). A staggering amount of high quality research has taken place at Cedar Creek. Owned and operated by the University of Minnesota in cooperation with the Minnesota Academy of Science, Creek Creek is a large ecological research station that is part of the Long-Term Ecological Research Network that exists in the US. Established in 1940, Cedar Creek is located in central Minnesota and contains natural habitats that represent the entire state. To cite Nee and Lawton’s (1996) Nature paper, Cedar Creek “is rapidly becoming one of ecology’s classic localities” (p. 672). Well, not wanting to assume that I am qualified to make the call, but I would say that Cedar Creek is one of ecology’s classic localities. If you’re in any doubt, then check out the publications that have been generated from work at Cedar Creek (be prepared to scroll!).
Like all things that work well, the strength of Cedar Creek comes down to its workforce. 24 Faculty members work at Cedar Creek, as well as 15 support staff, 10s of postdocs and postgrads and even more summer interns. This summer there are about 60 people working at Cedar Creek and – in two days time – I’ll be one of them. Yippee!
3). As an upshot of (1) and (2), some incredibly exciting opportunities are available for my research. I can take a fresh look at past experiments and surveys, tweak experiments that are already up and running and then there is the option of setting up an experiment myself. The world is most definitely my oyster – I can hardly believe my luck!
While being completely spoilt for choice is a wonderful situation to find oneself in, it does present the inevitable challenge of narrowing things down. So, in the next little while I plan to do some general reading, some Cedar Creek-themed reading, some Cedar Creek fieldwork and then a generous dose of coffee-fuelled and bike-inspired thinking. At the end of that, and the end of my two months here, I hope that some sparks will have flown, some light bulbs lit and some cool ideas arisen. Exciting times!
And now, off for a bike ride and a swim… You probably have an inkling where those activities will take place!
I was fortunate to attend a workshop hosted by the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility last year that focused on riparian ecosystems under climate change. Among the various discussions at the workshop, some colleagues and I started discussing how riparian ecosystems might be affected by climate change and ways in which their abiotic and biotic characteristics are likely to change. It soon became clear that envisioning future ecosystems is no easy task, so we set about trying to come up with an approach by which to do so.
We present our approach in a paper that has recently been published in the journal Ecosystems. Based around four recommendations, we present the approach in the first part of the paper. We then use four case studies from contrasting environments to illustrate the approach and to determine:
– Whether certain characteristics make some ecosystems more susceptible to climate-induced shifts in community structure than others; and
– Which aspect of climate change seems to have the greatest effect on community structure and therefore should be a research priority.
Focusing on changes in community structure, we use qualitative process models to predict likely abiotic and biotic changes in four case study systems: tropical coastal floodplains, temperate streams, high mountain streams and urban riparian zones. We concentrate on functional groups rather than individual species and consider dispersal constraints and the capacity for genetic adaptation. Our scenarios suggest that climatic changes will reduce indigenous diversity, facilitate non-indigenous invasion (especially C4 graminoids), increase fragmentation and result in simplified and less distinctive riparian ecosystems.
Compared to models based on biota-environment correlations, process models built on mechanistic understanding (like Bayesian belief networks) are more likely to remain valid under novel climatic conditions. We posit that predictions based on species’ functional traits will facilitate regional comparisons and can highlight effects of climate change on ecosystem structure and function. Ecosystems that have experienced similar modification to that expected under climate change (e.g. altered flow regimes of regulated rivers) can be used to help inform and evaluate predictions.
While the paper centres on Australian riparian zones experiencing climate change, the approach can be applied to ecosystems in other biomes that are subject to environmental change.
The paper is now online early; you can find the abstract and link here.
As mentioned in a previous post, I was lucky enough to be awarded one of the inaugural ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher Awards (DECRA) late last year. I officially started my DECRA research in April, so I thought it was time that I introduce it – albeit rather briefly.
In essence, I am planning to investigate the susceptibility of native vegetation edges to alien plant invasion using quantitative and experimental approaches. The project will contain both theoretical and applied elements and will primarily examine plant invasion through a community ecology lens (or is it community assembly through an invasion lens??!).
I’ll specifically be looking at the combined (and interactive) effects of species traits, resource availability and propagule pressure on invasion success using Bayesian meta-analysis, causal modelling and a field experiment. As stated in my grant application, “disentangling effects of alien species’ seed supply, high resource availability (light, water, nutrients) and species’ traits on invasion will indicate their relative influence on plant invasion and community assembly. As a result, new knowledge will be gained on the efficacy of invasive species prevention and control by indicating which invasion pathways to target, and under what conditions.”
The project will run for three years and I’ll be splitting my time between Australia and the US to achieve it. The plan is to work with CEED/NERP folk on the more quantitative aspects of the project while in Australia (principally with people like Brendan Wintle, Cindy Hauser, Mick McCarthy and Peter Vesk in the QAEcology group at Melbourne Uni, but also with Phil Gibbons and David Lindenmayer at the Australian National University; more on that later). I’ll conduct the experiment at Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve in Minnesota working with David Tilman. I’m planning to spend two months at the University of Minnesota this year (July-August) and then 6 months for the following two years (roughly April-Sept/Oct). As a lover of warm weather, an endless summer comes as an added bonus!
Jan 2012 – Some colleagues and I have recently written a paper that examines the relationship between the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) and alien plant invasions. Published in Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, the paper is structured around two questions: in accordance with IDH, 1) at what disturbance frequencies is alien plant colonisation most likely and why, and 2) where along the disturbance continuum (at which successional stage) are alien plants likely to reduce community diversity and why? We use understanding of community and invasion ecology to answer these questions, drawing on empirical evidence from a variety of terrestrial ecosystems. We conclude the paper by discussing implications and strategies for managing plant communities and how patterns of invasion might change in the future.
You can find a summary of the paper on our lab website.
Dec 2011 – Condensing a rather large topic down to a single page, I discuss some of the processes that lead to high levels of invasion in riparian zones in this article. I also present information on why we should be concerned about riparian plant invasion, as well as some of the management approaches that are available. Published in the Inland Rivers Network News, you can find the article on page 9 of the Summer 2012 edition.
Nov 2011 – I’ve just been awarded a Discovery Early Career Researcher Award from the Australian Research Council. Over the next three years (2012-2015), I will investigate the susceptibility of native vegetation edges to alien plant invasion using quantitative and experimental approaches. I’ll specifically be looking at the combined (and interactive) effects of species traits, resource availability and propagule pressure on invasion success. As such, it’ll effectively be an experiment in community assembly, but one with an invasion flavour. Working with David Tilman, I’ll be conducting the experiment at Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve in Minnesota.
Oct 2011 – I recently published a paper in Global Change Biology with Peter Vesk, Dave Richardson and Petr Pyšek that identifies the best way to quantify the level of invasion by non-native animals and plants.
For a summary of the paper, check out this post on our lab website,